Could this be called an Air-shaka?
I mean, we also make the distinction between flakas and Air-flakas.
Yes, true, actually you could be right.
How come a wrong backside 360°, as you insisted so vividly in calling it,landed even behind the “wave”, suddendly turns into a Shaka or even Air Shaka?! C7 talking like politicians.
It’s a shaka.
It’s an air shaka. Nothing else. And it’s f***ing siiiick.
Landing behind the wave is definitely not a Backside 360°
whaaat? can’t you guys see that its an air schnickschnack (knick-knack)? isn’t it obvious?
schnickschnackschnickschnack. First we are attacked in insisting on anything and now we are attacked on not insisting??? Strange world. Please more constructive comments and not so offensive. Pleeeeaaase. Makes more fun.
It’s called “coherence”. This is a WRONG Backside 360 landed by accident behind the chop. So call it a NOT landed fake “air” backside wave 360…
Don’t care what you guys call it, what it should be called, or not, if it’s on the wave or behind, back or front. What I call it: SIICKKK! And that’s how it should be
Why is it that everytime a Köster move is put on C7 some people just go out of their way to discredit it? A Shaka just like a Flaka is a Freestyle move that doesn’t care about waves, their faces or backs and as such it is landed no matter what was the intention. A landed forward is still a forward even if you took off intending to go for the double.